PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMUN vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMUN vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GMUN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSIE

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.80%
6M
6.00%
YTD
8.87%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
9.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMUN vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
-0.34%5.92%0.31%3.69%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
8.87%32.53%5.23%10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GMUN and GSIE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2023

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMUN vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMUN vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMUNGSIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

GMUN vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMUN vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMUNGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

Volatility

GMUN vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMUNGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

GMUN vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GMUN vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

GMUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.94%3.22%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.55%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMUN and GSIE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMUN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMUN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

GMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.55% for GSIE.

GMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GMUN tracks Bloomberg Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GMUN and 0.25% for GSIE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMUN and GSIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer