GLUX.DE vs. CIBR
GLUX.DE (Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLUX.DE is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Luxury, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLUX.DE returned 9.44%/yr vs 18.08%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLUX.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLUX.DE is traded in EUR, while CIBR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLUX.DE achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GLUX.DE has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 9.44%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.08% annualized return.
GLUX.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- -0.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
CIBR
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 28.83%
- YTD
- 28.61%
- 6M
- 22.28%
- 1Y
- 22.96%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.08%
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLUX.DE Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR | -7.03% | 2.34% | 4.43% | 11.98% | -19.34% | 32.41% | 23.80% | 33.53% | -9.13% | 22.10% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.61% | -0.35% | 26.01% | 35.52% | -21.90% | 28.63% | 38.12% | 31.42% | 6.24% | 4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLUX.DE and CIBR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GLUX.DE and CIBR has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
GLUX.DE
CIBR
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLUX.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.18 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.01 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 2.38 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLUX.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 0.93 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.69 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.76 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLUX.DE and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLUX.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -35.19% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.00% | -22.83% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -24.33% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.52% | -28.91% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.20% | -35.19% | -8.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.70% | -3.70% | -11.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -8.74% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 9.66% | -3.15% |
Volatility
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) is 5.55%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that GLUX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLUX.DE | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 11.17% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.60% | 21.25% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 24.92% | -5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 24.78% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 23.90% | -2.96% |
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLUX.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLUX.DE vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
GLUX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
GLUX.DE Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLUX.DE and CIBR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLUX.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLUX.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
GLUX.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. GLUX.DE tracks S&P Global Luxury, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GLUX.DE and 0.60% for CIBR.
Find the right allocation for GLUX.DE and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer