GLUX.DE vs. WMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Walmart Inc. (WMT).
GLUX.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Luxury. It was launched on Jan 31, 2018.
Performance
GLUX.DE vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLUX.DE vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLUX.DE Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR | -10.34% | 2.34% | 4.43% | 11.98% | -19.34% | 32.41% | 23.80% | 33.53% | -9.13% | 22.10% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 13.92% | 9.72% | 85.47% | 9.50% | 5.70% | 9.60% | 13.16% | 33.10% | 1.10% | 28.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
GLUX.DE is traded in EUR, while WMT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WMT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLUX.DE achieves a -10.34% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GLUX.DE has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 8.50%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.34% annualized return.
GLUX.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -10.34%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- -2.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 24.59%
- 1Y
- 32.19%
- 3Y*
- 35.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.57%
- 10Y*
- 20.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLUX.DE vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
GLUX.DE
WMT
GLUX.DE vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLUX.DE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | 1.27 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 1.98 | -1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.24 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 3.43 | -3.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | 8.37 | -8.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLUX.DE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 1.27 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 1.13 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.89 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.65 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLUX.DE and WMT is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLUX.DE vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
GLUX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLUX.DE Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.76% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Drawdowns
GLUX.DE vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLUX.DE and WMT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLUX.DE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -77.14% | +33.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.00% | -10.92% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.52% | -25.74% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.20% | -25.74% | -17.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.73% | -6.64% | -11.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -14.66% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 3.97% | +0.98% |
Volatility
GLUX.DE vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 6.17%. This indicates that GLUX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLUX.DE | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 6.17% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 17.56% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.25% | 25.53% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 21.94% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 22.81% | -2.04% |