PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLUX.DE
Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR
-10.34%2.34%4.43%11.98%-19.34%32.41%23.80%33.53%-9.13%22.10%
LUXG.L
Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD
-10.11%1.36%4.69%12.09%-18.87%31.90%24.48%33.01%-8.97%21.64%
Different Trading Currencies

GLUX.DE is traded in EUR, while LUXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LUXG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLUX.DE having a -10.34% return and LUXG.L slightly higher at -10.11%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: GLUX.DE at 8.50% and LUXG.L at 8.50%.


GLUX.DE

1D
2.85%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-10.34%
6M
-7.13%
1Y
1.38%
3Y*
-2.54%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
8.50%

LUXG.L

1D
2.91%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-10.11%
6M
-6.95%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
-2.53%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLUX.DE and LUXG.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLUX.DE
GLUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LUXG.L
LUXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LUXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LUXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLUX.DELUXG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

0.07

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

0.23

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.03

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.05

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.24

0.15

+0.08

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLUX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is comparable to the LUXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLUX.DE and LUXG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLUX.DELUXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

0.07

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.02

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.41

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.43

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between GLUX.DE and LUXG.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLUX.DE nor LUXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, roughly equal to the maximum LUXG.L drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLUX.DE and LUXG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLUX.DELUXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-36.58%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.00%

-15.95%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.52%

-29.20%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.20%

-36.58%

-6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.73%

-14.84%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-8.10%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

4.78%

+0.17%

Volatility

GLUX.DE vs. LUXG.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) and Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L) have volatilities of 6.99% and 6.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLUX.DELUXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

6.81%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

13.22%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

20.52%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

20.61%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

20.74%

+0.03%