GLTR vs. SILJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLTR returned 13.17%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for SILJ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.

Performance

GLTR vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 13.17%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.

GLTR

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 53.06%
• 3Y*: 32.36%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

SILJ

• 1D: -5.24%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 6M: 16.40%
• 1Y: 111.95%
• 3Y*: 47.77%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTR vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	1.47%	87.25%	20.63%	2.01%	-0.25%	-9.60%	29.52%	20.96%	-2.85%	12.94%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	6.61%	183.89%	6.39%	-5.21%	-15.42%	-23.21%	33.00%	57.06%	-27.95%	-5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTR and SILJ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012	0.74

The correlation between GLTR and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLTR vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 36
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 54
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTR vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLTR	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.05	-0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.35	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.32	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	3.24	-1.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	7.99	-3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLTR vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLTR	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	2.05	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.30	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.22	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.09	+0.24

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTR	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.70%	-79.04%	+23.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.70%	-34.71%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.70%	-34.71%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	-55.47%	+25.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.70%	-70.06%	+40.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.86%	-26.80%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.83%	-41.43%	+12.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.88%	14.06%	-1.18%

Volatility

GLTR vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 9.13%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 18.69%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTR	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.13%	18.69%	-9.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.41%	45.24%	-9.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.58%	54.90%	-17.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	44.35%	-20.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.50%	46.24%	-25.74%

GLTR vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLTR vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.88%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLTR and SILJ in my portfolio?

GLTR and SILJ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLTR or SILJ?

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to GLTR (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs SILJ's -79.04%.

Which ETF is better, GLTR or SILJ?

On 10-year performance, GLTR leads with 13.17% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLTR or SILJ?

Over the 10-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLTR or SILJ?

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLTR or SILJ?

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

What is the main difference between GLTR and SILJ?

GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while SILJ is Silver. GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.69% for SILJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.