SILJ vs. SIL
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL).
SILJ and SIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SILJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Junior Silver Miners & Explorers Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2012. SIL is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Stuttgart Solactive AG Global Silver Miners (USD). It was launched on Apr 19, 2010. Both SILJ and SIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SILJ or SIL.
Key characteristics
| SILJ | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.50% | 21.98% |
| 1Y Return | 38.08% | 40.65% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.68% | -5.51% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.13% | 4.40% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.87% | 3.21% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.18 | 1.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.78 | 1.94 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.80 | 0.67 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.57 | 5.06 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.39% | 9.59% |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.27% | 35.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -79.04% | -82.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -39.45% | -57.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and SIL is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SILJ vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 17.50% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's 21.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 3.87%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.21% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SILJ vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SILJ vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SILJ vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SIL's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.10% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 0.41% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.22% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% | 0.08% | 0.66% |
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SILJ vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) have volatilities of 13.58% and 13.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.