SILJ vs. SLV
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both Silver funds - SILJ tracks the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index while SLV tracks the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 10.08%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
SILJ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 10.08%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
SILJ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and SLV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SILJ and SLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SILJ vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SILJ
SLV
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SILJ
SLV
Financial Services
SILJ
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
SILJ
SLV
-
Communication Services
SILJ
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
SILJ
-
SLV
-
Energy
SILJ
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
SILJ
-
SLV
-
Industrials
SILJ
-
SLV
-
Real Estate
SILJ
-
SLV
-
Technology
SILJ
-
SLV
-
Utilities
SILJ
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
SLV
SILJ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SILJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.62 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 5.64 | +2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SILJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.89 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.58 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.49 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.25 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -76.28% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.71% | -42.45% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | -42.45% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.47% | -42.45% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -42.81% | -27.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.80% | -37.30% | +10.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -44.67% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.06% | 19.67% | -5.61% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.30%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.69% | 16.30% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.24% | 58.31% | -13.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.90% | 58.90% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.35% | 36.15% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 31.84% | +14.40% |
SILJ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and SLV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to SLV (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLV has been the lower-risk option at 16.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.50% for SLV.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer