PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILJ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 10.08%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


SILJ

1D
-5.24%
1M
2.57%
YTD
6.61%
6M
16.40%
1Y
111.95%
3Y*
47.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
10.08%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
6.61%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and SLV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.73

The correlation between SILJ and SLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SILJ vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SILJ
SLV

Basic Materials

99.8%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SILJ
99.8%
SLV
100.0%

Financial Services

SILJ
0.3%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

SILJ
0.2%
SLV

-

Communication Services

SILJ
0.0%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

SILJ

-

SLV

-

Energy

SILJ

-

SLV

-

Healthcare

SILJ

-

SLV

-

Industrials

SILJ

-

SLV

-

Real Estate

SILJ

-

SLV

-

Technology

SILJ

-

SLV

-

Utilities

SILJ

-

SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILJSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.62

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

5.64

+2.35

SILJ vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILJSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.89

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.58

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.49

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.25

-0.16

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-76.28%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.71%

-42.45%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-42.45%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.47%

-42.45%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-42.81%

-27.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.80%

-37.30%

+10.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-44.67%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

19.67%

-5.61%

Volatility

SILJ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.30%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILJSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

16.30%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.24%

58.31%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.90%

58.90%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.35%

36.15%

+8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

31.84%

+14.40%

SILJ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILJ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.88%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SILJ and SLV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to SLV (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLV has been the lower-risk option at 16.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.50% for SLV.

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILJ and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer