GLTR vs. PPLT
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT).
GLTR and PPLT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. PPLT is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 8, 2010. Both GLTR and PPLT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLTR vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLTR vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 6.38% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -4.40% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than PPLT's -4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 14.10%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
PPLT
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -17.00%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 24.74%
- 1Y
- 95.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLTR vs. PPLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLTR and PPLT have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
PPLT
GLTR vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 1.95 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.20 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.85 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 8.64 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.95 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.30 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.24 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.03 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and PPLT is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLTR vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTR nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and PPLT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -70.73% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | -34.41% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | -34.74% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | -51.14% | +21.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.32% | -29.34% | +6.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.89% | -40.08% | +11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.54% | 11.36% | -2.82% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 13.48%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a volatility of 16.06%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 16.06% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.75% | 44.64% | -8.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.11% | 49.13% | -12.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 32.03% | -8.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 28.73% | -8.45% |