PPLT vs. PLTM
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM).
PPLT and PLTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PPLT is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 8, 2010. PLTM is a passively managed fund by GraniteShares that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both PPLT and PLTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PPLT or PLTM.
Key characteristics
| PPLT | PLTM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -5.98% | -6.01% |
| 1Y Return | 4.40% | 4.49% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.33% | -5.31% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.44% | 0.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.29 | 0.30 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.13 | 0.23 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.08% | 8.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.52% | 24.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -70.73% | -42.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -54.68% | -28.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and PLTM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PPLT vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PPLT having a -5.98% return and PLTM slightly lower at -6.01%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PPLT vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PPLT vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PPLT vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and PLTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PPLT vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) have volatilities of 7.05% and 7.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.