PPLT vs. SPPP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L).
PPLT and SPPP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PPLT is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 8, 2010. SPPP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Platinum. It was launched on Apr 13, 2011. Both PPLT and SPPP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PPLT vs. SPPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PPLT vs. SPPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -4.40% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
SPPP.L Invesco Physical Platinum | -3.15% | 120.27% | -9.95% | -5.99% | 10.53% | -8.02% | 6.77% | 22.56% | -14.26% | 0.90% |
Different Trading Currencies
PPLT is traded in USD, while SPPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPLT achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPPP.L's -3.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PPLT having a 6.81% annualized return and SPPP.L not far behind at 6.77%.
PPLT
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -17.00%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 24.74%
- 1Y
- 95.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
SPPP.L
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -17.85%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- 23.34%
- 1Y
- 93.50%
- 3Y*
- 24.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PPLT vs. SPPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPLT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPPP.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PPLT vs. SPPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PPLT
SPPP.L
PPLT vs. SPPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPLT | SPPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.99 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 2.28 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.75 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 8.13 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPLT | SPPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.99 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.44 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.32 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.16 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between PPLT and SPPP.L is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PPLT vs. SPPP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPLT nor SPPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PPLT vs. SPPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPLT drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than SPPP.L's maximum drawdown of -56.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLT and SPPP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPLT | SPPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -44.86% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -33.68% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -33.68% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.14% | -44.86% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.34% | -29.42% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.08% | -18.60% | -21.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.36% | 11.32% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PPLT vs. SPPP.L - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) have volatilities of 16.06% and 16.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PPLT | SPPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.06% | 16.67% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.64% | 42.77% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.13% | 47.79% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 42.10% | -10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 38.82% | -10.09% |