GLTR vs. PALL
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL).
GLTR and PALL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. Both GLTR and PALL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLTR vs. PALL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLTR vs. PALL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 6.38% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 55.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than PALL's -7.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTR has outperformed PALL with an annualized return of 14.10%, while PALL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.50% annualized return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLTR vs. PALL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLTR and PALL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. PALL — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
PALL
GLTR vs. PALL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 1.01 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.48 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 1.51 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 4.55 | +3.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.01 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | -0.28 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.25 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.20 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and PALL is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLTR vs. PALL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLTR nor PALL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. PALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum PALL drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and PALL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -73.63% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | -34.17% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | -73.63% | +43.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | -73.63% | +43.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.32% | -54.34% | +31.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.89% | -26.51% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.54% | 11.31% | -2.77% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. PALL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 13.48%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a volatility of 15.73%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | PALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 15.73% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.75% | 43.92% | -8.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.11% | 48.74% | -11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 42.07% | -18.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 37.71% | -17.43% |