PALL vs. SPPP
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP).
PALL and SPPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. SPPP is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Dec 19, 2012.
Performance
PALL vs. SPPP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. SPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 55.73% |
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -7.78% | 89.43% | -11.89% | -25.86% | -2.37% | -21.77% | 23.84% | 46.00% | 5.53% | 35.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP's -7.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PALL having a 9.50% annualized return and SPPP not far behind at 9.27%.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
SPPP
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -18.00%
- YTD
- -7.78%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 56.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALL vs. SPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SPPP's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. SPPP — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
SPPP
PALL vs. SPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.56 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.58 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 4.81 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | -0.12 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.28 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.11 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and SPPP is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PALL vs. SPPP - Dividend Comparison
Neither PALL nor SPPP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PALL vs. SPPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than SPPP's maximum drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and SPPP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -59.09% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -37.42% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -59.09% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -59.09% | -14.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -31.22% | -23.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -26.42% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 12.30% | -0.99% |
Volatility
PALL vs. SPPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) is 15.73%, while Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) has a volatility of 16.95%. This indicates that PALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | SPPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 16.95% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 46.40% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 49.39% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 34.38% | +7.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 32.88% | +4.83% |