PALL vs. SIVR
PALL (abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PALL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PALL returned 5.38%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for SIVR. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PALL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
PALL vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -20.11% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's -18.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PALL has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 5.38%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.
PALL
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -24.51%
- YTD
- -20.11%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.52%
- 5Y*
- -14.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.05%
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- 6M
- -30.49%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 1Y
- 56.26%
- 3Y*
- 33.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.54M | $14.21M | $19.69M | |
| $49.50M | $48.83M | $86.59M |
PALL vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -20.11% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 55.73% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -18.61% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and SIVR is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PALL and SIVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (10 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
SIVR
PALL vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PALL | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.10 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 2.11 | -1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PALL vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -75.85% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.20% | -52.27% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.20% | -52.27% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -52.27% | -21.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -52.27% | -21.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.63% | -50.35% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.13% | -47.84% | +20.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.01% | 27.28% | -5.27% |
Volatility
PALL vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 11.28%. This indicates that PALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 11.28% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.54% | 55.47% | -19.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 61.33% | -10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.62% | 37.00% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.19% | 32.26% | +5.93% |
PALL vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PALL vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PALL nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PALL and SIVR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PALL has higher volatility (11.96%) compared to SIVR (11.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALL dropped -73.63% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 10.56% vs 5.38% for PALL. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SIVR has been the lower-risk option at 11.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PALL.
PALL and SIVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PALL is categorized as Precious Metals, while SIVR is Silver. PALL tracks Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt), while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALL and 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PALL and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer