GLTR vs. GBUG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott. GLTR is passively managed, while GBUG is actively managed. Over the past year, GLTR returned 53.69% vs 63.04% for GBUG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for GBUG.

Performance

GLTR vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than GBUG's -1.44% return.

GLTR

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 12.80%
• 1Y: 53.69%
• 3Y*: 32.62%
• 5Y*: 15.53%
• 10Y*: 13.23%

GBUG

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: -1.44%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 63.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTR vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	2.41%	67.06%
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	-1.44%	119.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTR and GBUG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.80

The correlation between GLTR and GBUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLTR vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 38
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 37
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTR vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLTR	GBUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.33	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.74	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.24	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	1.97	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.15	5.05	-0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLTR vs. GBUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the GBUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and GBUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLTR	GBUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.33	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	1.74	-1.42

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than GBUG's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and GBUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTR	GBUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.70%	-32.10%	-23.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.70%	-32.10%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.18%	-25.98%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.83%	-7.68%	-21.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.98%	12.52%	+0.46%

Volatility

GLTR vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is 9.16%, while Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) has a volatility of 15.44%. This indicates that GLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTR	GBUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.16%	15.44%	-6.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.42%	39.41%	-3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.57%	47.62%	-10.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	47.31%	-23.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.50%	47.31%	-26.81%

GLTR vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLTR vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.

Position	TTM	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.58%	1.56%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLTR and GBUG in my portfolio?

GLTR and GBUG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLTR or GBUG?

GBUG has higher volatility (15.44%) compared to GLTR (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs GBUG's -32.10%.

Which ETF is better, GLTR or GBUG?

On 1-year performance, GBUG leads with 63.04% vs 53.69% for GLTR. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GLTR has been the lower-risk option at 9.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLTR or GBUG?

Over the 1-year period, GBUG has performed better with a 63.04% return vs 53.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLTR or GBUG?

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLTR or GBUG?

GBUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

What is the main difference between GLTR and GBUG?

GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while GBUG is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.89% for GBUG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.