PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBUG vs. RING
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBUG vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBUG vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBUG achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 7.25% return.


GBUG

1D
7.40%
1M
-21.89%
YTD
4.01%
6M
23.23%
1Y
112.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RING

1D
6.67%
1M
-20.56%
YTD
7.25%
6M
22.69%
1Y
108.05%
3Y*
48.58%
5Y*
24.99%
10Y*
17.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GBUG vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GBUG vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBUG
GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

RING
RING Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBUG vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBUGRINGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.33

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.52

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.64

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.63

13.06

-0.43

GBUG vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the RING Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBUG and RING, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBUGRINGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.33

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.34

0.12

+2.23

Correlation

The correlation between GBUG and RING is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GBUG vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than RING's 0.78% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBUG
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
1.50%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
0.78%0.84%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.83%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.41%0.96%

Drawdowns

GBUG vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBUG drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBUG and RING.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBUGRINGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-79.47%

+47.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.10%

-30.11%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.89%

-20.56%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-47.75%

+42.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.90%

8.38%

+0.52%

Volatility

GBUG vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) has a higher volatility of 19.60% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 18.16%. This indicates that GBUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBUGRINGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.60%

18.16%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.38%

38.56%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.40%

46.62%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.41%

35.85%

+11.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.41%

36.85%

+10.56%