GBUG vs. RING
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).
GBUG and RING are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBUG is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Feb 19, 2025. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Performance
GBUG vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GBUG vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF | 4.01% | 119.00% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 7.25% | 110.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBUG achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 7.25% return.
GBUG
- 1D
- 7.40%
- 1M
- -21.89%
- YTD
- 4.01%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- 1Y
- 112.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RING
- 1D
- 6.67%
- 1M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 108.05%
- 3Y*
- 48.58%
- 5Y*
- 24.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBUG vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBUG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GBUG vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank
GBUG
RING
GBUG vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBUG | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.52 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 3.64 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.63 | 13.06 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBUG | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.34 | 0.12 | +2.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between GBUG and RING is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GBUG vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than RING's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF | 1.50% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.78% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
GBUG vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBUG drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBUG and RING.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBUG | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -79.47% | +47.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.10% | -30.11% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.89% | -20.56% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -47.75% | +42.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 8.38% | +0.52% |
Volatility
GBUG vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) has a higher volatility of 19.60% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 18.16%. This indicates that GBUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GBUG | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.60% | 18.16% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.38% | 38.56% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.40% | 46.62% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.41% | 35.85% | +11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.41% | 36.85% | +10.56% |