GBUG vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GBUG (Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GBUG is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. GBUG is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. Over the past year, GBUG returned 63.91% vs 80.04% for SLV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBUG charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.

Performance

GBUG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBUG achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -8.55% return.

GBUG

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: -5.10%
• 6M: -9.63%
• 1Y: 63.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLV

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -13.82%
• YTD: -8.55%
• 6M: -5.70%
• 1Y: 80.04%
• 3Y*: 41.99%
• 5Y*: 19.74%
• 10Y*: 13.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBUG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	-5.10%	122.37%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-8.55%	116.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GBUG and SLV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.75

The correlation between GBUG and SLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GBUG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 35
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 36
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBUG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GBUG	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.34	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.69	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	1.77	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.61	3.70	+0.91

GBUG vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBUG and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GBUG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBUG drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBUG and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBUG	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.90%	-76.28%	+39.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.90%	-45.40%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.73%	-44.21%	+15.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-44.65%	+36.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.90%	21.70%	-7.80%

Volatility

GBUG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) has a higher volatility of 18.68% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 13.67%. This indicates that GBUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBUG	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.68%	13.67%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.14%	59.03%	-16.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.10%	60.18%	-10.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.46%	36.51%	+11.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.46%	32.05%	+16.41%

GBUG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBUG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBUG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

GBUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.64%	1.56%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBUG and SLV in my portfolio?

GBUG and SLV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GBUG or SLV?

GBUG has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to SLV (13.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBUG dropped -36.90% vs SLV's -76.28%.

Which ETF is better, GBUG or SLV?

On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 80.04% vs 63.91% for GBUG. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLV has been the lower-risk option at 13.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GBUG or SLV?

Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 80.04% return vs 63.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GBUG or SLV?

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GBUG or SLV?

GBUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

What is the main difference between GBUG and SLV?

GBUG is categorized as Gold, while SLV is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for GBUG and 0.50% for SLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.