GLTR vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. GLTR is passively managed, while BCI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLTR returned 15.32%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for BCI. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

GLTR vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 26.68% return.

GLTR

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 53.06%
• 3Y*: 32.36%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

BCI

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 25.55%
• 1Y: 38.68%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTR vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	1.47%	87.25%	20.63%	2.01%	-0.25%	-9.60%	29.52%	20.96%	-2.85%	2.22%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	26.68%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	15.09%	26.18%	-2.77%	7.06%	-11.21%	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTR and BCI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017	0.44

The correlation between GLTR and BCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLTR vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 36
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTR vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLTR	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.30	-0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	2.92	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	5.10	-3.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	13.14	-9.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLTR vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTR and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLTR	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	2.30	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.66	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.48	-0.16

Drawdowns

GLTR vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLTR	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.70%	-32.69%	-23.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.70%	-7.61%	-22.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.70%	-11.38%	-18.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	-26.50%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.86%	-4.52%	-22.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.83%	-12.00%	-16.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.88%	2.95%	+9.93%

Volatility

GLTR vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 5.16%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLTR	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.13%	5.16%	+3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.41%	14.80%	+20.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.58%	16.92%	+20.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.63%	16.82%	+6.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.50%	15.65%	+4.85%

GLTR vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLTR vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLTR and BCI in my portfolio?

GLTR and BCI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLTR or BCI?

GLTR has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to BCI (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLTR dropped -55.70% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, GLTR or BCI?

On 5-year performance, GLTR leads with 15.32% vs 11.07% for BCI. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLTR or BCI?

Over the 5-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLTR or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLTR or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

What is the main difference between GLTR and BCI?

GLTR is categorized as Precious Metals, while BCI is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GLTR and 0.25% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.