GLTR vs. BCI
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI).
GLTR and BCI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. BCI is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
GLTR vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLTR vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 6.38% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 2.22% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 24.37% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 2.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLTR achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 24.37% return.
GLTR
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
BCI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 24.37%
- 6M
- 31.23%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLTR vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLTR vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
GLTR
BCI
GLTR vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLTR | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 1.87 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.46 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.52 | -1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 9.71 | -1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLTR | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.87 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.80 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.48 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTR and BCI is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLTR vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.26% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
Drawdowns
GLTR vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTR drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTR and BCI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLTR | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -32.69% | -23.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | -9.28% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | -26.50% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.32% | 0.00% | -23.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.89% | -12.19% | -16.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.54% | 3.37% | +5.17% |
Volatility
GLTR vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 7.07%. This indicates that GLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLTR | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.48% | 7.07% | +6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.75% | 13.57% | +22.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.11% | 17.09% | +20.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 16.63% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 15.57% | +4.71% |