BCI vs. KMLM

In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's -5.91% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCI and KMLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than KMLM's 0.87% yield.

The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -29.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and KMLM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 2.21%. This indicates that BCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.