BCI vs. GNR
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR).
BCI and GNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCI is an actively managed fund by Abrdn Plc. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. GNR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BCI or GNR.
Correlation
The correlation between BCI and GNR is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BCI vs. GNR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BCI:
0.33
GNR:
-0.34
BCI:
0.56
GNR:
-0.34
BCI:
1.07
GNR:
0.95
BCI:
0.18
GNR:
-0.32
BCI:
0.80
GNR:
-0.82
BCI:
5.57%
GNR:
8.20%
BCI:
13.50%
GNR:
19.90%
BCI:
-32.69%
GNR:
-51.37%
BCI:
-15.57%
GNR:
-10.56%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than GNR's 4.08% return.
BCI
5.01%
-2.40%
4.65%
4.40%
13.58%
N/A
GNR
4.08%
-4.07%
-5.17%
-7.88%
12.72%
4.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCI vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BCI vs. GNR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BCI
GNR
BCI vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BCI vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison
BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than GNR's 4.55% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 3.14% | 3.30% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 4.55% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.60% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
BCI vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and GNR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BCI vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is 7.21%, while SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that BCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.