GLL vs. SILJ
GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLL returned -22.08%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for SILJ. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. GLL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
GLL vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's -1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed SILJ with an annualized return of -22.08%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.82% annualized return.
GLL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 21.41%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- -40.15%
- 3Y*
- -39.64%
- 5Y*
- -27.61%
- 10Y*
- -22.08%
SILJ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
GLL vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -5.47% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -1.77% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and SILJ is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | -0.68 |
The correlation between GLL and SILJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLL vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
GLL
SILJ
GLL vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 2.19 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 5.65 | -6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLL vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, which is greater than SILJ's maximum drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.24% | -79.04% | -20.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.10% | -39.16% | -25.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.95% | -39.16% | -48.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.76% | -53.55% | -36.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.76% | -70.06% | -25.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.83% | -32.56% | -66.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.13% | -41.40% | -43.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.47% | 15.17% | +27.30% |
Volatility
GLL vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is 15.23%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 20.76%. This indicates that GLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLL | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 20.76% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.29% | 47.36% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.94% | 56.54% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.34% | 44.76% | -8.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 46.41% | -14.03% |
GLL vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLL vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.04% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLL and SILJ have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to GLL (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLL dropped -99.24% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, SILJ leads with 8.82% vs -22.08% for GLL. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, GLL has been the lower-risk option at 15.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 8.82% return vs -22.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.
GLL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while SILJ is Silver. GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%), while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GLL and 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLL and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer