GLIN vs. FLTR
GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLIN returned 2.09%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLIN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
GLIN vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIN achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIN has underperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 2.09%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.51% annualized return.
GLIN
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- -4.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
GLIN vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | -3.75% | -5.47% | 15.64% | 36.13% | -21.46% | 29.57% | -0.29% | -21.49% | -37.41% | 66.53% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.91% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIN and FLTR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2011 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLIN vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GLIN
FLTR
GLIN vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLIN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 6.77 | -7.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | 12.78 | -13.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 3.15 | -2.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 16.96 | -17.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 101.23 | -101.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLIN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 6.77 | -7.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 2.11 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.70 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.53 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
GLIN vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIN drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIN and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.36% | -17.84% | -61.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.56% | -0.31% | -18.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.77% | -1.93% | -24.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.97% | -3.06% | -27.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.80% | -17.84% | -56.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.29% | -0.04% | -45.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.97% | -0.67% | -50.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 0.05% | +6.23% |
Volatility
GLIN vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that GLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLIN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 0.25% | +6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 0.62% | +14.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 0.79% | +16.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 2.13% | +16.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 5.00% | +18.68% |
GLIN vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLIN vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than FLTR's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 0.88% | 0.84% | 3.58% | 0.96% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.42% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 1.39% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLIN and FLTR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLIN has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIN dropped -79.36% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 10-year performance, FLTR leads with 3.51% vs 2.09% for GLIN. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 3.51% return vs 2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.88% for GLIN.
GLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for GLIN and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLIN and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer