GLIN vs. INCO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO).
GLIN and INCO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLIN is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2010. INCO is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Indxx India Consumer Index. It was launched on Aug 10, 2011. Both GLIN and INCO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLIN or INCO.
Correlation
The correlation between GLIN and INCO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GLIN vs. INCO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GLIN:
1.03
INCO:
1.20
GLIN:
1.43
INCO:
1.81
GLIN:
1.21
INCO:
1.21
GLIN:
0.36
INCO:
1.05
GLIN:
5.09
INCO:
2.82
GLIN:
3.44%
INCO:
5.75%
GLIN:
17.05%
INCO:
13.53%
GLIN:
-79.39%
INCO:
-47.69%
GLIN:
-39.20%
INCO:
-14.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIN achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than INCO's 13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIN has underperformed INCO with an annualized return of 2.65%, while INCO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.
GLIN
17.08%
1.15%
1.89%
17.53%
10.70%
2.65%
INCO
13.53%
-1.75%
-4.45%
16.19%
14.31%
10.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLIN vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLIN vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLIN vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison
GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than INCO's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 3.53% | 0.96% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.29% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 1.39% | 3.11% | 0.97% | 0.44% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 2.86% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLIN vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIN drawdown since its inception was -79.39%, which is greater than INCO's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIN and INCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLIN vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) at 3.28%. This indicates that GLIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.