PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLIN vs. INDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLIN vs. INDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GLIN

1D
2.39%
1M
7.11%
YTD
3.97%
6M
3.68%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
3.07%

INDF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIN vs. INDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
3.97%-5.47%15.64%36.13%-21.46%29.57%13.46%
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
0.00%8.17%6.32%19.86%-5.28%11.95%24.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIN and INDF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between GLIN and INDF has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GLIN vs. INDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLIN
INDF

Financial Services

35.5%
100.0%

Industrials

20.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.5%

-

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

8.1%

-

Communication Services

5.2%

-

Utilities

3.6%

-

Energy

2.2%

-

Technology

2.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

GLIN
35.5%
INDF
100.0%

Industrials

GLIN
20.5%
INDF

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLIN
14.5%
INDF

-

Healthcare

GLIN
8.2%
INDF

-

Basic Materials

GLIN
8.1%
INDF

-

Communication Services

GLIN
5.2%
INDF

-

Utilities

GLIN
3.6%
INDF

-

Energy

GLIN
2.2%
INDF

-

Technology

GLIN
2.0%
INDF

-

Consumer Defensive

GLIN
0.6%
INDF

-

Real Estate

GLIN
0.0%
INDF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLIN vs. INDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLIN
GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

INDF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIN vs. INDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLININDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.66

GLIN vs. INDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLIN vs. INDF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLININDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.38%

Volatility

GLIN vs. INDF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLININDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

GLIN vs. INDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than INDF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLIN vs. INDF - Dividend Comparison

GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while INDF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
0.81%0.84%3.58%0.96%1.70%0.00%0.24%1.42%0.12%0.10%1.39%3.11%
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
21.29%21.29%6.15%8.84%3.12%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLIN and INDF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INDF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INDF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.

INDF has the higher dividend yield at 21.29%, compared with 0.81% for GLIN.

GLIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INDF is Financials Equities. GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index, while INDF tracks Nifty Financial Services 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for GLIN and 0.75% for INDF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLIN and INDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer