GLIN vs. INDF
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF).
GLIN and INDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLIN is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2010. INDF is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Nifty Financial Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2020. Both GLIN and INDF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLIN vs. INDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLIN vs. INDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | -12.04% | -5.47% | 15.64% | 36.13% | -21.46% | 29.57% | 13.86% |
INDF Nifty India Financials ETF | 0.00% | 8.17% | 6.32% | 19.86% | -5.28% | 11.95% | 23.97% |
Returns By Period
GLIN
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -12.80%
- YTD
- -12.04%
- 6M
- -8.42%
- 1Y
- -4.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
INDF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLIN vs. INDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than INDF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLIN vs. INDF — Risk / Return Rank
GLIN
INDF
GLIN vs. INDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) and Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLIN | INDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLIN | INDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIN and INDF is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GLIN vs. INDF - Dividend Comparison
GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than INDF's 21.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 0.96% | 0.84% | 3.58% | 0.96% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.42% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 1.39% | 3.11% |
INDF Nifty India Financials ETF | 21.29% | 21.29% | 6.15% | 8.84% | 3.12% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLIN vs. INDF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIN | INDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.04% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.66% | — | — |
Volatility
GLIN vs. INDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLIN | INDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.62% | — | — |