PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GK vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GK vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GK vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
-7.99%17.78%20.10%21.19%-42.76%4.95%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
-10.37%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%10.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a -7.99% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's -10.37% return.


GK

1D
3.90%
1M
-7.00%
YTD
-7.99%
6M
-9.92%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
10Y*

VUG

1D
4.00%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-10.37%
6M
-8.73%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GK vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GK vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK
GK Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GKVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.81

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.31

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.11

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

3.96

+1.46

GK vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GK Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GK and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GKVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.81

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.57

-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between GK and VUG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GK vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than VUG's 0.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
0.08%0.08%0.00%0.13%1.30%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.46%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Drawdowns

GK vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and VUG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GKVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.72%

-50.68%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-16.53%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.10%

-13.20%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.74%

-7.13%

-17.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

4.66%

-0.73%

Volatility

GK vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 7.23% and 7.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GKVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

7.00%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

12.65%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

22.68%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.06%

22.23%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

21.38%

+2.68%