GK vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SENT is a Long-Short fund tracking the Actively Managed. GK is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GK returned 20.83%/yr vs -3.03%/yr for SENT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

GK vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GK

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 9.38%
• YTD: 17.29%
• 6M: 16.22%
• 1Y: 34.45%
• 3Y*: 20.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	17.29%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-42.76%	4.95%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and SENT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2021	0.60

The correlation between GK and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GK vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GK	SENT
Technology	38.9%	26.2%
Communication Services	16.6%	1.9%
Industrials	16.3%	14.6%
Healthcare	7.6%	24.8%
Financial Services	6.1%	6.1%
Utilities	4.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	3.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Energy	-	10.3%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

GK vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 54
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 57
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GK	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GK	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	-0.25	+0.41

Drawdowns

GK vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-30.34%	-17.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	0.00%	-15.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	-15.83%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-27.23%	+26.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-20.90%	-3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	0.00%	+3.94%

Volatility

GK vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GK	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	0.00%	+5.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.64%	0.00%	+13.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.30%	0.00%	+17.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.93%	12.66%	+11.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.93%	13.32%	+10.61%

GK vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

GK vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GK and SENT in my portfolio?

GK and SENT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GK or SENT?

GK has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, GK or SENT?

On 3-year performance, GK leads with 20.83% vs -3.03% for SENT. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GK or SENT?

Over the 3-year period, GK has performed better with a 20.83% return vs -3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GK or SENT?

GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GK or SENT?

GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between GK and SENT?

GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SENT is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 1.01% for SENT.