GK vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GK is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GK returned 18.34%/yr vs 22.13%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

GK vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return.

GK

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 18.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GK vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	13.03%	17.78%	20.10%	21.19%	-42.76%	4.61%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GK and SCHG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.90

The correlation between GK and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

GK vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GK	SCHG
Technology	37.9%	46.7%
Industrials	16.9%	6.0%
Communication Services	16.3%	15.3%
Healthcare	8.0%	8.4%
Financial Services	6.9%	6.6%
Utilities	5.2%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Energy	-	0.7%
Real Estate	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

GK vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GK

GK Risk / Return Rank: 42
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 43

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GK vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GK	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.11	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	1.56	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.20	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.10	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.74	3.58	+3.16

GK vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GK and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GK vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GK	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-34.59%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.13%	-16.41%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	-23.39%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-6.46%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.77%	-5.20%	-18.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	5.02%	-0.98%

Volatility

GK vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GK	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	5.91%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	12.52%	+2.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.71%	16.24%	+2.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.02%	22.38%	+1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.02%	21.58%	+2.44%

GK vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GK vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.00%	0.13%	1.30%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GK and SCHG in my portfolio?

GK and SCHG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GK or SCHG?

GK has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, GK or SCHG?

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 22.13% vs 18.34% for GK. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GK or SCHG?

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 22.13% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GK or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GK or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.07% for GK.

What is the main difference between GK and SCHG?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.