GIS vs. STRL
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) are both stocks. GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.58%/yr vs 60.70%/yr for STRL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -15.22% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 112.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of -2.58%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 60.70% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 14.39%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 1Y
- -20.32%
- 3Y*
- -17.57%
- 5Y*
- -4.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.23%
STRL
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -24.56%
- 6M
- 85.27%
- YTD
- 112.33%
- 1Y
- 159.10%
- 3Y*
- 123.86%
- 5Y*
- 97.68%
- 10Y*
- 60.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.34%
GIS vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -15.22% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 112.33% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and STRL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.07 |
The correlation between GIS and STRL shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$20.06B
STRL:
$19.95B
GIS:
-$0.16
STRL:
$11.16
GIS:
1.10
STRL:
7.00
GIS:
2.74
STRL:
16.97
GIS:
$18.42B
STRL:
$2.88B
GIS:
$6.19B
STRL:
$664.66M
GIS:
$300.90M
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
STRL
GIS vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.35 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 4.48 | -5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 11.67 | -12.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -92.51% | +32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -35.74% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -47.67% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -47.67% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -59.60% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.03% | -34.57% | -17.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -46.21% | +35.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.80% | 13.69% | +4.11% |
Volatility
GIS vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 12.90%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 22.45%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 22.45% | -9.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.53% | 66.61% | -45.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 84.99% | -58.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 57.70% | -35.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 53.99% | -31.57% |
Dividends
GIS vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.49% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GIS vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and STRL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (22.45%) compared to GIS (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs STRL's -92.51%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer