PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIS vs. SJM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GIS vs. SJM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -26.51% return, which is significantly lower than SJM's 6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed SJM with an annualized return of -3.08%, while SJM has yielded a comparatively higher -0.36% annualized return.


GIS

1D
-0.03%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
-26.51%
6M
-25.64%
1Y
-36.06%
3Y*
-22.93%
5Y*
-8.46%
10Y*
-3.08%

SJM

1D
-1.71%
1M
3.68%
YTD
6.26%
6M
3.23%
1Y
-4.38%
3Y*
-9.42%
5Y*
-2.33%
10Y*
-0.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIS vs. SJM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
-26.51%-23.75%1.45%-19.97%28.09%18.53%13.60%43.13%-31.57%-0.65%
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
6.26%-7.56%-9.61%-17.79%20.06%21.05%14.50%14.90%-22.58%-0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and SJM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1994

0.43

The correlation between GIS and SJM shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIS:

$17.98B

SJM:

$10.86B

EPS

GIS:

$4.08

SJM:

-$11.77

PS Ratio

GIS:

0.98

SJM:

1.22

PB Ratio

GIS:

1.92

SJM:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIS:

$18.37B

SJM:

$8.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIS:

$4.70B

SJM:

$3.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIS:

$3.03B

SJM:

-$291.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIS vs. SJM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS
GIS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SJM
SJM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SJM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SJM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIS vs. SJM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GISSJMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.00

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.19

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.94

-0.44

-1.50

GIS vs. SJM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.52, which is lower than the SJM Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and SJM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GISSJMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.52

-0.15

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

-0.10

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

-0.01

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.31

+0.11

Drawdowns

GIS vs. SJM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than SJM's maximum drawdown of -45.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and SJM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GISSJMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.63%

-45.67%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.97%

-22.82%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.56%

-35.35%

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.63%

-38.11%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.63%

-38.11%

-21.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.42%

-28.87%

-29.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-13.48%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.63%

10.04%

+8.59%

Volatility

GIS vs. SJM - Volatility Comparison

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) have volatilities of 6.96% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GISSJMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

6.74%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

17.90%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

29.94%

-6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

23.79%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

24.21%

-2.12%

Dividends

GIS vs. SJM - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than SJM's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
7.36%5.20%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
4.32%4.46%3.89%3.29%2.54%2.78%3.08%3.32%3.49%2.46%2.22%2.12%

Financials

GIS vs. SJM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.44B
2.34B
(GIS) Total Revenue
(SJM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GIS vs. SJM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Mills, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
39.2%
Portfolio components
GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SJM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a gross profit of 915.80M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.2%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

SJM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported an operating income of -548.40M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.4%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

SJM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a net income of -724.20M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of -31.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GIS and SJM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIS has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to SJM (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs SJM's -45.67%.

SJM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIS and SJM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer