SJM vs. CAG
Compare and contrast key facts about The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SJM or CAG.
Correlation
The correlation between SJM and CAG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SJM vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SJM:
0.01
CAG:
-0.88
SJM:
0.29
CAG:
-1.21
SJM:
1.03
CAG:
0.85
SJM:
0.05
CAG:
-0.59
SJM:
0.24
CAG:
-1.55
SJM:
6.72%
CAG:
14.50%
SJM:
24.64%
CAG:
24.15%
SJM:
-45.66%
CAG:
-56.94%
SJM:
-25.15%
CAG:
-37.56%
Fundamentals
SJM:
$11.73B
CAG:
$10.72B
SJM:
-$2.40
CAG:
$0.68
SJM:
2.33
CAG:
0.32
SJM:
1.34
CAG:
0.91
SJM:
1.72
CAG:
1.24
SJM:
$6.58B
CAG:
$11.74B
SJM:
$2.56B
CAG:
$3.10B
SJM:
$323.90M
CAG:
$1.22B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJM achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -15.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SJM has outperformed CAG with an annualized return of 2.36%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively lower 0.50% annualized return.
SJM
3.36%
-3.11%
3.78%
2.44%
2.70%
2.36%
CAG
-15.61%
-9.59%
-14.69%
-21.18%
-4.04%
0.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SJM vs. CAG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SJM
CAG
SJM vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SJM vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
SJM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than CAG's 6.15% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 4.78% | 3.89% | 3.29% | 2.54% | 2.78% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 3.49% | 2.46% | 2.22% | 2.12% | 2.42% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 6.15% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% |
Drawdowns
SJM vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJM drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum CAG drawdown of -56.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJM and CAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
SJM vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) is 5.16%, while Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that SJM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
SJM vs. CAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The J. M. Smucker Company and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SJM vs. CAG - Profitability Comparison
SJM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a gross profit of 878.10M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 710.30M and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.0%.
SJM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The J. M. Smucker Company reported an operating income of -594.00M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of -27.2%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 266.60M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
SJM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a net income of -662.30M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 145.10M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.