SJM vs. PG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).

Performance

SJM vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SJM vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company	-1.39%	-7.56%	-9.61%	-17.79%	20.06%	21.05%	14.50%	14.90%	-22.58%	-0.49%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	1.26%	-12.26%	17.25%	-0.86%	-5.05%	20.52%	14.15%	39.70%	3.57%	12.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SJM : $10.19B PG : $349.27B
EPS SJM : -$11.77 PG : $6.75
PS Ratio SJM : 1.14 PG : 4.12
PB Ratio SJM : 1.95 PG : 6.55
Total Revenue (TTM) SJM : $8.93B PG : $85.26B
Gross Profit (TTM) SJM : $3.00B PG : $43.21B
EBITDA (TTM) SJM : -$291.90M PG : $23.62B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJM achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SJM has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -0.21%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.53% annualized return.

SJM

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -16.73%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 6M: -10.23%
• 1Y: -16.18%
• 3Y*: -12.18%
• 5Y*: -2.21%
• 10Y*: -0.21%

PG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -11.88%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: -4.60%
• 1Y: -13.20%
• 3Y*: 1.51%
• 5Y*: 4.01%
• 10Y*: 8.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SJM vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJM

SJM Risk / Return Rank: 13
SJM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SJM Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SJM Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SJM Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SJM Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 13
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJM vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SJM	PG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	-0.70	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	-0.87	+0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.90	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	-0.72	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.66	-1.33	-0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SJM vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJM Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is comparable to the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJM and PG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SJM	PG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54	-0.70	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.23	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	0.45	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.46	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between SJM and PG is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SJM vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

SJM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than PG's 2.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company	4.59%	4.46%	3.89%	3.29%	2.54%	2.78%	3.08%	3.32%	3.49%	2.46%	2.22%	2.12%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.93%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%

Drawdowns

SJM vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJM drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJM and PG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJM	PG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.67%	-54.25%	+8.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.52%	-18.31%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.66%	-23.77%	-12.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.71%	-23.77%	-12.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.99%	-17.11%	-16.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-12.15%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.67%	9.89%	-0.22%

Volatility

SJM vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJM	PG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	5.44%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.24%	13.45%	+4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.91%	18.81%	+11.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.60%	17.45%	+6.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.24%	18.84%	+5.40%

Financials

SJM vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The J. M. Smucker Company and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SJM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a gross profit of 915.80M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.2%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 11.37B and revenue of 22.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

SJM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported an operating income of -548.40M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.4%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 5.37B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.

SJM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a net income of -724.20M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of -31.0%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 4.33B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.