GIS vs. QQQ
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.44%/yr vs 21.01%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -12.69% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -2.44%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.01% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 14.45%
- 6M
- -12.21%
- YTD
- -12.69%
- 1Y
- -17.93%
- 3Y*
- -15.76%
- 5Y*
- -4.77%
- 10Y*
- -2.44%
QQQ
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 27.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 21.01%
GIS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -12.69% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 15.19% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and QQQ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GIS and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
QQQ
GIS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.26 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 2.29 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 8.13 | -9.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -82.97% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -11.96% | -22.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -22.77% | -30.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -35.12% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -35.12% | -24.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.60% | -5.29% | -45.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -32.66% | +22.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.69% | 3.36% | +14.33% |
Volatility
GIS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 7.53%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 7.53% | +5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.66% | 15.52% | +6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 18.69% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 22.81% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 22.44% | -0.03% |
Dividends
GIS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.30% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and QQQ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to QQQ (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer