GIS vs. MKC
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.69%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for MKC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. MKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -16.19% return, which is significantly higher than MKC's -21.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed MKC with an annualized return of -2.69%, while MKC has yielded a comparatively higher 2.06% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 13.09%
- 6M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -16.19%
- 1Y
- -19.76%
- 3Y*
- -17.88%
- 5Y*
- -5.14%
- 10Y*
- -2.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.20%
MKC
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 13.26%
- 6M
- -21.43%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 1Y
- -23.61%
- 3Y*
- -13.71%
- 5Y*
- -7.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.93%
GIS vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -16.19% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -21.75% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and MKC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.39 |
The correlation between GIS and MKC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$19.83B
MKC:
$14.07B
GIS:
-$0.16
MKC:
$6.05
GIS:
1.09
MKC:
1.91
GIS:
2.71
MKC:
2.01
GIS:
$18.42B
MKC:
$7.39B
GIS:
$6.19B
MKC:
$2.85B
GIS:
$300.90M
MKC:
$1.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
MKC
GIS vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.66 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | -1.26 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than MKC's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and MKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -52.02% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -35.93% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -45.65% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -52.02% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -52.02% | -7.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.58% | -44.42% | -8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -11.12% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.86% | 18.76% | -0.90% |
Volatility
GIS vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 13.02% compared to McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) at 11.85%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.02% | 11.85% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.43% | 25.45% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.40% | 29.68% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 24.88% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 24.44% | -2.02% |
Dividends
GIS vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than MKC's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.57% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.61% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
Financials
GIS vs. MKC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 778.20M and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 276.40M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 160.20M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and MKC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to MKC (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs MKC's -52.02%.
GIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and MKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer