MKC vs. MDLZ
Compare and contrast key facts about McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ).
Performance
MKC vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MKC vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -28.97% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 6.94% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
Fundamentals
MKC:
$13.03B
MDLZ:
$73.73B
MKC:
$6.10
MDLZ:
$1.89
MKC:
7.93
MDLZ:
30.23
MKC:
1.83
MDLZ:
1.92
MKC:
1.87
MDLZ:
2.85
MKC:
$7.11B
MDLZ:
$38.54B
MKC:
$2.70B
MDLZ:
$10.94B
MKC:
$1.22B
MDLZ:
$4.50B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKC achieves a -28.97% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MKC has underperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 1.53%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.73% annualized return.
MKC
- 1D
- -4.08%
- 1M
- -30.79%
- YTD
- -28.97%
- 6M
- -27.60%
- 1Y
- -39.64%
- 3Y*
- -14.58%
- 5Y*
- -9.68%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- -12.83%
- 3Y*
- -3.81%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKC vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank
MKC
MDLZ
MKC vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MKC | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | -0.57 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | -0.68 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.92 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.50 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.40 | -0.96 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MKC | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.41 | -0.57 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | 0.11 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.27 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.32 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between MKC and MDLZ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MKC vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison
MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than MDLZ's 3.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.78% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
MKC vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than MDLZ's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and MDLZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKC | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.54% | -42.52% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.93% | -25.93% | -13.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.54% | -29.14% | -20.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -29.74% | -19.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.54% | -20.81% | -28.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -10.99% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.53% | 13.57% | +2.96% |
Volatility
MKC vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison
McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 7.03%. This indicates that MKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MKC | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 7.03% | +3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.28% | 16.35% | +5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.18% | 22.47% | +5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 19.22% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 21.01% | +2.98% |
Financials
MKC vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MKC vs. MDLZ - Profitability Comparison
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
MDLZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.96B and revenue of 10.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
MDLZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 952.00M and revenue of 10.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.
MDLZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 665.00M and revenue of 10.50B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.