MKC vs. CVS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS).

Performance

MKC vs. CVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MKC vs. CVS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated	-28.97%	-8.33%	13.97%	-15.68%	-12.65%	2.67%	14.70%	23.65%	39.01%	11.34%
CVS CVS Health Corporation	-7.91%	84.35%	-40.77%	-12.53%	-7.63%	54.87%	-5.14%	17.26%	-7.04%	-5.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MKC : $13.03B CVS : $92.57B
EPS MKC : $6.10 CVS : $1.39
PE Ratio MKC : 7.93 CVS : 52.15
PS Ratio MKC : 1.83 CVS : 0.23
PB Ratio MKC : 1.87 CVS : 1.23
Total Revenue (TTM) MKC : $7.11B CVS : $402.07B
Gross Profit (TTM) MKC : $2.70B CVS : $55.36B
EBITDA (TTM) MKC : $1.22B CVS : $8.69B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKC achieves a -28.97% return, which is significantly lower than CVS's -7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MKC has outperformed CVS with an annualized return of 1.53%, while CVS has yielded a comparatively lower -0.66% annualized return.

MKC

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -30.79%
• YTD: -28.97%
• 6M: -27.60%
• 1Y: -39.64%
• 3Y*: -14.58%
• 5Y*: -9.68%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

CVS

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -11.23%
• YTD: -7.91%
• 6M: -4.14%
• 1Y: 10.70%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: 2.82%
• 10Y*: -0.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MKC vs. CVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKC

MKC Risk / Return Rank: 1
MKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MKC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MKC Martin Ratio Rank: 0

CVS

CVS Risk / Return Rank: 52
CVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CVS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CVS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKC vs. CVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and CVS Health Corporation (CVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MKC	CVS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.41	0.35	-1.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.09	0.62	-2.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.09	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	0.67	-1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.40	1.65	-4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MKC vs. CVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKC Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the CVS Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKC and CVS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MKC	CVS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.41	0.35	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.41	0.10	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06	-0.02	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.31	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between MKC and CVS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MKC vs. CVS - Dividend Comparison

MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than CVS's 3.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated	3.78%	2.69%	2.24%	2.32%	1.81%	1.44%	1.68%	1.37%	1.53%	1.89%	1.89%	1.91%
CVS CVS Health Corporation	3.67%	3.35%	5.93%	3.06%	2.36%	1.94%	2.93%	2.69%	3.05%	2.76%	2.15%	1.43%

Drawdowns

MKC vs. CVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum CVS drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and CVS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MKC	CVS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.54%	-64.07%	+14.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.93%	-16.44%	-22.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.54%	-56.79%	+7.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.54%	-56.79%	+7.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.54%	-24.78%	-24.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-19.59%	+8.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.53%	6.72%	+9.81%

Volatility

MKC vs. CVS - Volatility Comparison

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to CVS Health Corporation (CVS) at 6.10%. This indicates that MKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MKC	CVS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.84%	6.10%	+4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.28%	23.05%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.18%	30.81%	-2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.89%	29.35%	-5.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.99%	28.93%	-4.94%

Financials

MKC vs. CVS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between McCormick & Company, Incorporated and CVS Health Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MKC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

CVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.57B and revenue of 105.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.8%.

MKC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

CVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported an operating income of 2.11B and revenue of 105.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

MKC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.

CVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CVS Health Corporation reported a net income of 2.94B and revenue of 105.69B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.