PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIS vs. INGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GIS vs. INGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -26.51% return, which is significantly lower than INGR's -8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed INGR with an annualized return of -3.08%, while INGR has yielded a comparatively higher 0.54% annualized return.


GIS

1D
-0.03%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
-26.51%
6M
-25.64%
1Y
-36.06%
3Y*
-22.93%
5Y*
-8.46%
10Y*
-3.08%

INGR

1D
-0.32%
1M
-7.20%
YTD
-8.27%
6M
-5.02%
1Y
-25.77%
3Y*
0.35%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
0.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIS vs. INGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
-26.51%-23.75%1.45%-19.97%28.09%18.53%13.60%43.13%-31.57%-0.65%
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
-8.27%-17.86%29.22%14.08%4.47%26.35%-12.55%4.70%-33.10%13.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and INGR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1997

0.32

The correlation between GIS and INGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GIS:

$4.08

INGR:

$13.96

PE Ratio

GIS:

8.12

INGR:

7.14

PEG Ratio

GIS:

3.50

INGR:

0.08

PS Ratio

GIS:

0.98

INGR:

0.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIS:

$18.37B

INGR:

$5.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIS:

$4.70B

INGR:

$1.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIS:

$3.03B

INGR:

$902.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIS vs. INGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS
GIS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

INGR
INGR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INGR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INGR Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIS vs. INGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GISINGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

0.74

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.97

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.94

-1.64

-0.30

GIS vs. INGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.52, which is comparable to the INGR Sharpe Ratio of -1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and INGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GISINGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.52

-1.58

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

0.17

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.02

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.29

+0.13

Drawdowns

GIS vs. INGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum INGR drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and INGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GISINGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.63%

-64.20%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.97%

-26.69%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.56%

-33.21%

-22.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.63%

-33.21%

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.63%

-56.14%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.42%

-33.07%

-25.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-18.31%

+8.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.63%

15.72%

+2.91%

Volatility

GIS vs. INGR - Volatility Comparison

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) at 5.11%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GISINGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

5.11%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

11.74%

+6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

16.44%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

21.29%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

24.87%

-2.78%

Dividends

GIS vs. INGR - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than INGR's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
7.36%5.20%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
3.27%2.92%1.72%2.75%2.78%2.67%3.23%2.70%2.68%1.57%1.52%1.82%

Financials

GIS vs. INGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Ingredion Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.44B
0
(GIS) Total Revenue
(INGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GIS and INGR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIS has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to INGR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs INGR's -64.20%.

GIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.52 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIS and INGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer