INGR vs. NWL

In the year-to-date period, INGR achieves a -7.60% return, which is significantly higher than NWL's -31.73% return. Over the past 10 years, INGR has outperformed NWL with an annualized return of 6.98%, while NWL has yielded a comparatively lower -13.12% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current INGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the NWL Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INGR and NWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

INGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than NWL's 4.12% yield.

The maximum INGR drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, smaller than the maximum NWL drawdown of -88.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INGR and NWL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is 6.80%, while Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) has a volatility of 31.89%. This indicates that INGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingredion Incorporated and Newell Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.