INGR vs. FLO
INGR (Ingredion Incorporated) and FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, INGR returned 0.20%/yr vs -4.63%/yr for FLO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INGR vs. FLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INGR achieves a -10.34% return, which is significantly higher than FLO's -29.45% return. Over the past 10 years, INGR has outperformed FLO with an annualized return of 0.20%, while FLO has yielded a comparatively lower -4.63% annualized return.
INGR
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -10.34%
- 6M
- -10.98%
- 1Y
- -27.09%
- 3Y*
- 0.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 0.20%
FLO
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -29.90%
- 1Y
- -49.65%
- 3Y*
- -29.02%
- 5Y*
- -16.95%
- 10Y*
- -4.63%
INGR vs. FLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | -10.34% | -17.86% | 29.22% | 14.08% | 4.47% | 26.35% | -12.55% | 4.70% | -33.10% | 13.87% |
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | -29.45% | -43.63% | -4.34% | -18.63% | 7.97% | 25.63% | 7.73% | 21.80% | -0.93% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between INGR and FLO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1997 | 0.32 |
The correlation between INGR and FLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INGR:
$13.96
FLO:
$0.66
INGR:
6.98
FLO:
11.13
INGR:
0.88
FLO:
0.63
INGR:
$5.41B
FLO:
$2.47B
INGR:
$1.36B
FLO:
$1.19B
INGR:
$902.00M
FLO:
$289.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INGR vs. FLO — Risk / Return Rank
INGR
FLO
INGR vs. FLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INGR | FLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.73 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.90 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | -1.48 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INGR vs. FLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INGR drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, smaller than the maximum FLO drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INGR and FLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INGR | FLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -72.29% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.09% | -55.26% | +27.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.58% | -68.82% | +34.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.58% | -72.29% | +37.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.14% | -72.29% | +16.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.58% | -70.48% | +35.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.33% | -20.65% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.36% | 33.55% | -17.19% |
Volatility
INGR vs. FLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is 4.86%, while Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a volatility of 17.32%. This indicates that INGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INGR | FLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 17.32% | -12.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 29.77% | -18.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 35.70% | -18.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 25.09% | -3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 25.28% | -0.40% |
Dividends
INGR vs. FLO - Dividend Comparison
INGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than FLO's 11.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | 11.80% | 9.03% | 4.60% | 4.04% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 3.13% | 2.64% |
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | 3.35% | 2.92% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 2.67% | 3.23% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 1.57% | 1.52% | 1.82% |
Financials
INGR vs. FLO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingredion Incorporated and Flowers Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
INGR and FLO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLO has higher volatility (17.32%) compared to INGR (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INGR dropped -64.20% vs FLO's -72.29%.
FLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.40 vs -1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INGR and FLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer