GIS vs. AJG
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and AJG (Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.) are both stocks. GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while AJG operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.69%/yr vs 19.48%/yr for AJG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. AJG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -16.19% return, which is significantly lower than AJG's -3.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed AJG with an annualized return of -2.69%, while AJG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.48% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 13.09%
- 6M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -16.19%
- 1Y
- -19.76%
- 3Y*
- -17.88%
- 5Y*
- -5.14%
- 10Y*
- -2.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.20%
AJG
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 15.96%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -3.47%
- 1Y
- -18.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 19.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.55%
GIS vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -16.19% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | -3.47% | -8.03% | 27.34% | 20.51% | 12.44% | 39.02% | 32.12% | 31.79% | 19.19% | 25.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and AJG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
GIS:
$19.83B
AJG:
$63.78B
GIS:
-$0.16
AJG:
$5.74
GIS:
1.09
AJG:
4.64
GIS:
$18.42B
AJG:
$13.94B
GIS:
$6.19B
AJG:
$7.63B
GIS:
$300.90M
AJG:
$3.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
AJG
GIS vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.91 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.48 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | -0.81 | -0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, roughly equal to the maximum AJG drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and AJG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -57.49% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -38.59% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -44.40% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -44.40% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -44.40% | -15.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.58% | -27.89% | -24.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -12.88% | +2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.86% | 23.09% | -5.23% |
Volatility
GIS vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 13.02% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) at 11.18%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.02% | 11.18% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.43% | 24.19% | -2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.40% | 29.73% | -3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 23.44% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 23.25% | -0.83% |
Dividends
GIS vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than AJG's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.85% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.23% | 2.47% | 2.93% | 3.62% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.57% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
GIS vs. AJG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. AJG - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
AJG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
AJG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
AJG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and AJG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to AJG (11.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs AJG's -57.49%.
AJG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and AJG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer