GINN vs. XLKI
GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. GINN is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.
Performance
GINN vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than XLKI's 17.94% return.
GINN
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKI
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 17.94%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GINN vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 8.64% | 8.08% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 17.94% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GINN and XLKI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.79 |
GINN vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GINN
XLKI
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GINN
XLKI
-
Healthcare
GINN
XLKI
-
Consumer Cyclical
GINN
XLKI
-
Financial Services
GINN
XLKI
Communication Services
GINN
XLKI
-
Industrials
GINN
XLKI
-
Consumer Defensive
GINN
XLKI
-
Utilities
GINN
XLKI
-
Energy
GINN
XLKI
-
Real Estate
GINN
XLKI
-
Basic Materials
GINN
XLKI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GINN vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank
GINN
XLKI
GINN vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GINN | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GINN | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.24 | -1.79 |
Drawdowns
GINN vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and XLKI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GINN | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.25% | -10.24% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.60% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -1.61% | -11.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | — | — |
Volatility
GINN vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GINN | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 16.24% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 16.24% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 16.24% | +4.81% |
GINN vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GINN vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison
GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than XLKI's 14.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.18% | 8.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GINN and XLKI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.18%, compared with 1.16% for GINN.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.35% for XLKI.
Find the right allocation for GINN and XLKI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer