GINN vs. GSST

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) and GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GINN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while GSST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. GINN is passively managed, while GSST is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GINN returned 6.82%/yr vs 3.75%/yr for GSST. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GINN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GSST.

Performance

GINN vs. GSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than GSST's 1.55% return.

GINN

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 25.65%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: —

GSST

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 5.52%
• 5Y*: 3.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. GSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	8.64%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	9.84%
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.55%	5.20%	6.01%	6.08%	0.13%	0.05%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and GSST is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020	0.05

The correlation between GINN and GSST shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GINN vs. GSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 44
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

GSST

GSST Risk / Return Rank: 99
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GINN	GSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	7.98	-6.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	16.58	-14.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	3.94	-2.67
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	29.99	-28.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	185.54	-178.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GINN vs. GSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the GSST Sharpe Ratio of 7.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and GSST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GINN	GSST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	7.98	-6.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	5.99	-5.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	3.78	-3.33

Drawdowns

GINN vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than GSST's maximum drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and GSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	GSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-3.51%	-37.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-0.15%	-13.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.25%	-0.25%	-22.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	-1.19%	-40.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	0.00%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-0.16%	-13.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	0.02%	+3.62%

Volatility

GINN vs. GSST - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) at 0.13%. This indicates that GINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINN	GSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	0.13%	+3.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	0.41%	+11.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	0.58%	+15.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.33%	0.63%	+20.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	0.86%	+20.19%

GINN vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINN vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than GSST's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.16%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.32%	4.56%	5.45%	4.98%	1.97%	0.71%	1.12%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINN and GSST in my portfolio?

GINN and GSST have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GINN or GSST?

GINN has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs GSST's -3.51%.

Which ETF is better, GINN or GSST?

On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 6.82% vs 3.75% for GSST. On fees, GSST is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GSST has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GINN or GSST?

Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 6.82% return vs 3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINN or GSST?

GSST is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINN or GSST?

GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 1.16% for GINN.

What is the main difference between GINN and GSST?

GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while GSST is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.16% for GSST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.98 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.