GINN vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

GINN and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GINN is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2020. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

GINN vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GINN vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	-5.73%	26.58%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	42.50%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 42.50% return.

GINN

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: -5.73%
• 6M: -6.46%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 4.45%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 25.03%
• YTD: 42.50%
• 6M: 4.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

GINN

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

GINN vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 47
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GINN	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GINN	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.85	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and ARMH is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GINN vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than ARMH's 2.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.34%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.37%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GINN vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMH drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINN	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.25%	-42.04%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.41%	-12.19%	+2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-16.31%	+2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GINN	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.06%	50.51%	-29.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.29%	50.51%	-29.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.18%	50.51%	-29.33%