GIND vs. GSIE
GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIND is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. GIND is actively managed, while GSIE is passively managed. Over the past year, GIND returned -12.45% vs 19.98% for GSIE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
GIND vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIND achieves a -11.01% return, which is significantly lower than GSIE's 7.54% return.
GIND
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -11.01%
- 6M
- -10.72%
- 1Y
- -12.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
GIND vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF | -11.01% | 4.55% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 7.54% | 25.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIND and GSIE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between GIND and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
GIND vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GIND
GSIE
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
GIND
GSIE
Consumer Cyclical
GIND
GSIE
Industrials
GIND
GSIE
Basic Materials
GIND
GSIE
Technology
GIND
GSIE
Healthcare
GIND
GSIE
Consumer Defensive
GIND
GSIE
Energy
GIND
GSIE
Utilities
GIND
GSIE
Communication Services
GIND
GSIE
Real Estate
GIND
GSIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIND vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
GIND
GSIE
GIND vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIND | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.26 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 1.87 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 7.09 | -8.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIND | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | 1.42 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.52 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
GIND vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIND drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIND and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIND | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.97% | -34.63% | +11.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.97% | -10.76% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.63% | -1.25% | -14.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.88% | -6.06% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 2.82% | +6.75% |
Volatility
GIND vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) at 4.34%. This indicates that GIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIND | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 4.34% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 11.63% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 14.15% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 16.05% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 16.75% | +0.43% |
GIND vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIND vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.50% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIND and GSIE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIND has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to GSIE (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIND dropped -22.97% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 1-year performance, GSIE leads with 19.98% vs -12.45% for GIND. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 19.98% return vs -12.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GIND.
GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.
GIND is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GIND and 0.25% for GSIE.
GSIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIND and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer