GIND vs. INDH
GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) and INDH (WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. GIND is actively managed, while INDH is passively managed. Over the past year, GIND returned -13.74% vs -4.33% for INDH. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for INDH.
Performance
GIND vs. INDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIND achieves a -12.46% return, which is significantly lower than INDH's -8.93% return.
GIND
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- -12.46%
- 6M
- -11.52%
- 1Y
- -13.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDH
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIND vs. INDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF | -12.46% | 4.55% |
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | -8.93% | 9.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIND and INDH is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GIND and INDH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
GIND vs. INDH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GIND
INDH
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
GIND
INDH
Consumer Cyclical
GIND
INDH
Industrials
GIND
INDH
Basic Materials
GIND
INDH
Technology
GIND
INDH
Healthcare
GIND
INDH
Consumer Defensive
GIND
INDH
Energy
GIND
INDH
Utilities
GIND
INDH
Communication Services
GIND
INDH
Real Estate
GIND
INDH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIND vs. INDH — Risk / Return Rank
GIND
INDH
GIND vs. INDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) and WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIND | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.95 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.34 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -0.93 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIND | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | -0.34 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.07 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
GIND vs. INDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIND drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, which is greater than INDH's maximum drawdown of -15.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIND and INDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIND | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.97% | -15.05% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.97% | -12.94% | -10.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.00% | -10.96% | -6.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -5.67% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.52% | 4.68% | +4.84% |
Volatility
GIND vs. INDH - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) at 4.02%. This indicates that GIND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIND | INDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 4.02% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 11.50% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 12.93% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 14.43% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 14.43% | +2.71% |
GIND vs. INDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than INDH's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIND vs. INDH - Dividend Comparison
GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund | 5.77% | 5.25% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIND and INDH have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIND has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to INDH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIND dropped -22.97% vs INDH's -15.05%.
On 1-year performance, INDH leads with -4.33% vs -13.74% for GIND. On fees, INDH is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, INDH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INDH has performed better with a -4.33% return vs -13.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDH is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GIND.
INDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GIND and 0.64% for INDH.
INDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIND and INDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer