GIGL vs. FLTR
GIGL (Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIGL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
GIGL vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGL achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.99% return.
GIGL
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
GIGL vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 0.46% | 3.76% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.99% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGL and FLTR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGL vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GIGL
FLTR
GIGL vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIGL | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.53 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
GIGL vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGL | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -17.84% | +14.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -0.67% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
GIGL vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGL | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 0.79% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 2.13% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 5.00% | -0.84% |
GIGL vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGL vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 3.78% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGL and FLTR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GIGL.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.78% for GIGL.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GIGL and 0.14% for FLTR.
Find the right allocation for GIGL and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer