GIGL vs. GPIQ
GIGL (Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIGL is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, GIGL returned 4.94% vs 30.89% for GPIQ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
GIGL vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGL achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 15.39% return.
GIGL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 30.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIGL vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 1.13% | 3.76% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 15.39% | 13.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGL and GPIQ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGL vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GIGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GPIQ
GIGL vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGL | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGL vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGL | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -21.06% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -9.51% | +6.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.76% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.72% | -2.27% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility
GIGL vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGL | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 15.14% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 17.85% | -13.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 17.85% | -13.68% |
GIGL vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GIGL and GPIQ have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
GIGL vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than GPIQ's 9.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGL Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF | 3.75% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.56% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGL and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 30.89% vs 4.94% for GIGL. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 30.89% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIGL and GPIQ have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.56%, compared with 3.75% for GIGL.
GIGL is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for GIGL and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer