PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIGL vs. USIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIGL vs. USIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIGL achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than USIG's 0.56% return.


GIGL

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USIG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.37%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
2.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIGL vs. USIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GIGL and USIG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIGL vs. USIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIGL

USIG
USIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
USIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIGL vs. USIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GIGL vs. USIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIGLUSIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.54

+0.52

Drawdowns

GIGL vs. USIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, smaller than the maximum USIG drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and USIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIGLUSIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-22.21%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-0.97%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-3.42%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

Volatility

GIGL vs. USIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIGLUSIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

4.13%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.17%

6.82%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

6.82%

-2.65%

GIGL vs. USIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIGL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than USIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIGL vs. USIG - Dividend Comparison

GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than USIG's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIGL
Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF
3.78%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.62%4.51%3.94%3.14%2.33%2.82%3.37%3.44%3.03%2.87%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GIGL and USIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, USIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GIGL.

USIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 3.78% for GIGL.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GIGL and 0.04% for USIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIGL and USIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer