GGP.L vs. SSLN.L
GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) is a stock, while SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L returned 60.56%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGP.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 37.64% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 60.56%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 16.71% annualized return.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 37.64%
- 6M
- 77.66%
- 1Y
- 145.72%
- 3Y*
- 67.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 60.56%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
GGP.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 37.64% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | -2.95% | 997.06% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.18% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and SSLN.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, GGP.L and SSLN.L have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
SSLN.L
GGP.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGP.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 2.98 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 6.53 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGP.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.11 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.70 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.57 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.17 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, which is greater than SSLN.L's maximum drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.48% | -69.95% | -28.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.27% | -38.72% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.65% | -38.72% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.82% | -38.72% | -38.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | -38.72% | -47.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.69% | -33.62% | +23.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.13% | -45.32% | -19.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | 17.69% | -4.12% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) is 13.35%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that GGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 16.31% | -2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.61% | 51.81% | -10.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.83% | 54.53% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.86% | 33.31% | +31.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.93% | 29.69% | +61.24% |
Dividends
GGP.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGP.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGP.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GGP.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer