SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L).
SSLN.L and PHSP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. PHSP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 24, 2007. Both SSLN.L and PHSP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 5.00% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -5.59% |
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | 4.67% | 129.68% | 22.85% | -6.51% | 15.50% | -12.11% | 40.85% | 12.57% | -3.55% | -5.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly higher than PHSP.L's 4.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSLN.L having a 17.91% annualized return and PHSP.L not far behind at 17.64%.
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -19.40%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 61.96%
- 1Y
- 112.26%
- 3Y*
- 41.88%
- 5Y*
- 25.65%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
PHSP.L
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -19.56%
- YTD
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 61.54%
- 1Y
- 111.26%
- 3Y*
- 41.38%
- 5Y*
- 24.91%
- 10Y*
- 17.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PHSP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLN.L
PHSP.L
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLN.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.15 | 2.15 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.43 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.89 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 9.02 | +0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLN.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 2.15 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.78 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.61 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.38 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and PHSP.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor PHSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, roughly equal to the maximum PHSP.L drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and PHSP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLN.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -70.01% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.72% | -38.75% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -38.75% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -38.75% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.45% | -32.62% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.48% | -40.15% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.40% | 12.42% | -0.02% |
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. PHSP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) have volatilities of 17.88% and 18.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSLN.L | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.88% | 18.43% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.20% | 49.75% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.97% | 51.52% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.20% | 31.98% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.12% | 28.70% | +0.42% |