SSLN.L vs. HOC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L).
SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SSLN.L or HOC.L.
Key characteristics
| SSLN.L | HOC.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.13% | 100.28% |
| 1Y Return | 30.19% | 104.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.50% | 9.69% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.71% | 5.14% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.85% | 11.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.01 | 2.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.54 | 2.89 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.64 | 1.24 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.48 | 11.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.10% | 9.32% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.90% | 45.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.95% | -93.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.33% | -57.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and HOC.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. HOC.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 29.13% return, which is significantly lower than HOC.L's 100.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has underperformed HOC.L with an annualized return of 8.85%, while HOC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SSLN.L vs. HOC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. HOC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLN.L nor HOC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOC.L Hochschild Mining plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.05% | 3.30% | 3.05% | 2.16% | 2.52% | 0.90% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.37% |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. HOC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum HOC.L drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and HOC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. HOC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) is 9.79%, while Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that SSLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.