SSLN.L vs. SLVP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP).
SSLN.L and SLVP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. SLVP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both SSLN.L and SLVP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SSLN.L or SLVP.
Key characteristics
| SSLN.L | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.85% | 33.46% |
| 1Y Return | 29.66% | 59.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.54% | -1.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.61% | 8.16% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.23% | 5.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.17 | 1.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.73 | 2.18 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.05 | 5.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.02% | 10.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.87% | 38.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.95% | -80.47% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.90% | -38.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLN.L and SLVP is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SSLN.L vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SSLN.L achieves a 29.85% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 33.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SSLN.L has outperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 9.23%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLN.L vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SSLN.L vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SSLN.L vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 0.65% | 0.87% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 2.39% | 2.02% | 1.27% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 2.03% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
SSLN.L vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLN.L drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLN.L and SLVP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SSLN.L vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) is 9.80%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that SSLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.